Marc Dauncey <(Address removed)> said:
the only thing i wasn't keen on is the passive aggressive tone of the
terms of service. whilst i'm against "nasty things" and "nasty people"
i'm not sure i like the prospect of this site being more heavily modded
than before. modded boards don't have less flamewars and chaos in my
experience. in fact mod decisions sometimes trigger flamewars and
resentment. one of the things that is very important to me about ukd is
the self moderation. thats not going to change, is it?
I have no intention of changing the moderation style and anyone contributing to UKD before has no reason to be concerned about the TOS changing anything.
The terms were put together by a lawyer who used to work for my company but while the intention was to make them easier to understand than most, in practice the style grates on a lot of people and they're not easily skimmable. Hopefully that will be remedied later in the summer.
From our sources
- dcjarvis: @robinrimbaud you can choose what you're connected to, of course. No shame in being er, underground. But you could call that "unpopular" ;)
- dcjarvis: RT @juter: So Facebook makes 85% of its revenue from ads, needs to double its revenue per user and its users are moving to mobile. Good ...
- dcjarvis: RT @JacobSteinberg: OPERATION BLAME THE FOREIGN MAN A SUCCESS.
- TheBlackDog: @Peter_Pipes Morning
- TheBlackDog: @17twizzle Morning
- thesvelteone: @yrbigdaddy ?